Roll up, roll up! This evening we review another paper looking at guilt and shame in infant feeding by researchers at Liverpool University.
The paper starts, as most papers in this field do, with a recitation of the WHO creed that breastfeeding has, like, a million health benefits, and six months of exclusive breastfeeding is recommended and then breastfeeding for two years alongside other foods… Fear not: this paper will commit no heresy!
Continue reading “Whose Guilt is it Anyway?”Last week, the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) was accused of two crimes, when it published new guidance on safer sleeping.
Crime 1: Making no mention of women or mothers in these guidelines. Is RCM guilty of this crime? No. The guidance mentions the word ‘women’ or ‘woman’ four times and the word ‘mother’ or ‘mothers’ twice. Despite this, RCM confessed to the crime, apologised profusely, took the guidance down and are revising the language used.
Continue reading “RCM Ignores Feedback and the Evidence”We are going to look at a recent study of women’s perceptions of breastfeeding pain using online forums. It starts, as almost all papers about infant feeding do, with a recitation and affirmation of the creed that breastfeeding has many benefits. Oh boy…
Continue reading “We Discuss a New Paper on Experiences of Breastfeeding Pain”We would like to draw your attention to this review of the literature on breastmilk insufficiencies. It was written by a fellow mother, Dr Vera Wilde, whose baby suffered excessive weight loss as a result of insufficient milk intake, while exclusively breastfeeding.
Continue reading “Breastfeeding Insufficiencies: A New Review of the Evidence”It is likely that anyone following us will have seen recent news articles about failings at a Nottingham NHS Trust that led to avoidable deaths in their maternity unit. We were alarmed to hear of a baby who died after his parents raised concerns about his poor feeding. Continue reading “Our Comment on ‘Reluctant Feeder’ Guidelines”
We responded to a recent call for evidence from the government to inform a new women’s health strategy. The public consultation was promoted as an opportunity to ‘shape the future of women’s healthcare’. This is what we said:
Continue reading “Designing a New Strategy for Women’s Healthcare? Rethink Infant Feeding Policy!”
It has been an eventful weekend in the world of infant feeding. First off, the new president of the RCPCH (the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health), Dr Camilla Kingdon, used the Daily Mail to pronounce that formula fed babies are more likely to grow up to be obese. She also said that formula companies pursue stressed out parents and that the fall in health visiting numbers means parents aren’t getting the support they need to breastfeed.
NICE have published new guidelines on postnatal care. The committee responded to comments from stakeholders, including from us. Our comments and the responses from NICE can be found in this document, starting from page 114. Here is why we have said on Twitter that some guidelines are #NotNICENotEvidenceBased. Continue reading “Not NICE, Not Evidence Based”
This is another ‘notable’ paper about infant feeding. This time it’s an Australian study looking at feeding method and sleep. Continue reading “Who Needs Sleep?”
This is a remarkable paper… for all the wrong reasons. It was written by a group of breastfeeding researchers about the challenges they face advocating for breastfeeding on social media. Get yourself ready for some seriously bad science! Continue reading “Are They Talking About Us?”
